December 21, 2003

here at the end of all things

I didn’t feel that Return of the King was so much a letdown as a major personal disaster. Well, not really, but I don’t understand why so many say this is the best of the three movies. I really don’t think this movie shows Jackson’s true potential. And I don’t get all of this Tolkien’s vision and Jackson’s vision talk. I didn’t think Jackson was so much giving us his own version as a bad interpretation of Tolkien’s version. I was willing to give the “Jackson’s vision” excuse to anything in the first movie, but this movie seemed to be taking far too many liberties with original key elements to actually be good form. I think that anyone who was angry about the changes made in The Two Towers should have been just as angry about the changes made in Return of the King. Like Arwen. I couldn’t believe Jackson decided to bring her back more. I thought, oh, that’s over, she’ll just come in at the end and it’ll be all cool and happy and right. But I was forgetting that Jackson had gone too far in the last movie and he had to bring her back from the path to the Grey Havens and all. And that scene with Frodo getting mad at Sam over the lembas and then the one about Elrond coming to the camp and telling Aragorn to go through the Paths of the Dead and completely changing the motives. It was supposed to be destiny and Aragorn was supposed to know. It’s like Jackson didn’t want Aragorn to look like a king. It was all crap and it made me sad. I had to edit it out in my head.

What really bothered me was the cuts. It started out alright, but the further the movie went the more ridiculous it got. Cut to five seconds of Faramir and Denethor then cut to five seconds of Rohan then cut to five seconds of orcs, cut cut cut. I just wanted to finish something. The worst part of the cuts, though, was when Eowyn had her big scene with the Witch King and it was completely mangled by cuts. Jackson had to bring Aragorn back in the middle of the scene. He couldn’t just finish it and then go to Aragorn. And it didn’t cut to Aragorn just once, I think it was about five times.

Now I will talk about things I liked.

I liked the eighties sparkles when they were reforging the sword. I was waiting for the disco music to start. Sorry, too many eighties fantasy movies for me. Oh, and I also liked when Sam told Frodo, “Now we need to find you some clothes, you can’t go through Mordor showing the moon to everyone” . . . oh wait, he didn’t really say that, but wouldn’t it have been fun, a little hobbit innuendo to make everyone happy? There were some great singing parts with Merry and Pippen, and I loved the way they showed Pippin’s devotion to Gondor. I loved the Rohan parts. I think the movies really brought Rohan to life. Theoden has a magnificent kingly presence. My favorite part in the whole movie was the lighting of the signals. That was one of the most beautiful and moving montages (I hope I’m using that word correctly, I usually refrain from technical film talk) I have ever seen.

On the whole, I didn’t really like the movie, but I think it was mainly the editing that bothered me and perhaps with more viewings I could get over that. I also thought the Frodo and Sam scenes just dragged and none of the dialogue in this movie really struck me as worth remembering, except I was happy they put in, “I am glad you are here with me. Here at the end of all things, Sam.” There were glorious moments.

Posted by linnea at December 21, 2003 6:21 PM
Comments

See it a second time, try to watch it as a movie and not as a book. It helped me.

And no, you didn't use "montage" correctly. The "cutting" b/t Denethor and Faramir scene is a montage. And it is gorgeous. The lighting of the signals is a sequence. And a cheesy one at that.

Posted by: KornSt@r at December 21, 2003 10:42 PM

I agree with that. Everyone who is watching this movie looking for a literal translation is going to get pissed off when they can't find it.

Remember, this was originally a 4 1/2 hour movie that they had to cut down to 3 hours and 20 minutes. I hate those movie-length regulations...

Best scenes were:
-anything involving Theoden...Bernard Hill is awesome
-the two scenes featuring dialogue between Gandalf and Pippin
-the honoring of the hobbits
-the look on Frodo's face as the ship leaves

I need to see it again...

Posted by: steele at December 22, 2003 7:26 AM

I see you've been reading Josiah's blog. By the way, all those "cuts" were actually quite close to where Tolkien himself had "cuts" in the storyline.

Posted by: zach at December 22, 2003 8:38 AM

I actually wasn't looking for a literal translation from the book.

Posted by: linnea at December 22, 2003 12:40 PM

Maybe you didn't like the movie because it's secretly misogynist, at least according to Dallas Observer critic Gregory Weinkauf: "...when diminutive Frodo and Sam battle the massive female spider Shelob, they're very clearly confronting a furry, gargantuan vagina dentata, complete with goop-spurting action--echoes of Jackson's devouring-mother issues in Dead Alive."

I really hope that Dr. Foreman finds this quote. It will make him happy for weeks.

Posted by: mesh at December 22, 2003 3:21 PM

and now for something completely different.

...Linnea. Hi to your fam and all that...
You've got to go "Love Actually". it's just fab!

Posted by: Jeannette at December 22, 2003 4:58 PM

I like the cool juxtaposition of mesh's and jeanette's comments. First of all, I think Mesh is a hero for bringing this review to light. Second of all, I don't really know Jeanette.

Good night.

Posted by: bob at December 24, 2003 11:51 PM

Bob Nickles...the master of the nonsequiteur.

I liked the lighting of the signals too, cheesy or no. I think it has to be geographically inaccurate, though. How many branches of the White Mountains are there? And were the White Mountains supposed to be above cloud level? Questions of an admitted Tolkien nerd.

Posted by: Evan Donovan at December 26, 2003 5:35 PM

Anti-Aging Pages is a definite guide to supplements that have been proposed to slow and or reverse human aging.

Posted by: anti-aging at October 3, 2005 12:33 PM

antiaging | hgh | human growth hormone | hgh spray | anti aging

Posted by: anti aging at October 5, 2005 2:28 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?